'Junk food advertising\r'

'Subject 1: Because of the alarming wander of childhood obesity and the power of publicize to get in children, a growing number of people weigh that junk pabulum advertising should be out(p) or limited in some way. Would you be for or against such a ban? print a persuasive paragraph in which you breach and support your position on this issue. I potently believe that junk diet advertising should non be banned because it depart not break apart the childhood obesity issue and this measure testament go against the customers’ decently to be informed more or less unused products and discounts prices.First, junk food advertising should not be banned to reduce the childhood obesity. sight who support this new measure think that it is the perfect solution. However the reality is different. Although a ban result probably decrease of childhood obesity at first. In the long term it get out for certain not last. It is the p bents’ responsibility to educate thei r children c at a timerning the methods companies use to take out them to their products. It’s the parents’ duty to teach them that even if they are stagen something that they desire, they cant always get what they want.Junk food commercials are not the problem. However, over permissive parents who allow their kids to break and occupy anything they want are the culprits. For instance, I remember when I was younger I used to watch my favorite(a) cartoons e rattling weekend. In Between two cartoons roughly of the time there were some junk foods commercials shown, which had an ready on me because after seeing these advertisement I really wanted to go to MacDonald’s. I too remember that my parents told me that it was not healthy. They taught me skilful eating habits and they alike allowed me to eat junk food only once or twice a month.This framework show that junk food advertisement have very little impact on children. On the different hand the parents p lay a major purpose in the fight against obesity. Second, consumers have the in force(p) to be informed about new products and discount prices. forbidding junk food commercials will contradict this right. That is inconceivable. In 1962, President John F Kennedy presented a rescue to the United States Congress that mentioned the right to be informed. This right states that businesses should always provide consumers enough appropriate entropy to make intelligent and informed product choices.For example one night I did not get by what to eat and I saw on TV that Domino’s pizza was offering good deals. So, I decided to buy pizzas for dinner. Without this commercial I would not have been informed about this peculiar(prenominal) price. In addition banning junk food advertisement would interfere too much with the right of companies to sell legal products, and would require a uneasy bureaucracy to determine what junk food was and which programs were intend for children. Third , banning junk advertising will have deleterious effects on the economy.According to The Federal dish out Commission food corporations spend at least $1. billion in the US every social class to advertise their products. If the government bans specific commercial advertising enterprises. Advertisement companies as well as the makers of the products denote will see a decrease in their revenue. Disney channel estimated that the ban will cost them 7 millions of dollars. In conclusion banning junk food advertising is not a solution because it will not resolve the child obesity problem. Also, consumers will no longer be aware of new products and services. Finally it will have negative effects on the economy.\r\n'