Justin Choi, John Chun, Gary Moliver 03.29.05 Dear Editor, Just a couple of weeks ago, I happened to come crossways your editorial. As if the title werent ridiculous enough, I believe you wheel spoke about this inane thought that athletes un sololy imbibe profits and rights as opposed to the layman, who does not do anything, only expects everything. To start off, lets just say that the First Amendment was not created for your admit amusement. Secondly, you obviously give the bouncenot stick out the burden our athletes of today stand taken upon themselves, such(prenominal) as going to dedicate if theyre not busy trying to mend ends meet. Not only do athletes have tougher days than the grinder employee who induces an eight mo day, athletes mustiness compete in games, matches, or fights for nearly both hours at a metre in some cases. starting signal at a pedant level, athletes need to be pampered by society and be enured better than others because they are suc h peculiar(a) and benevolent persons who refractory to take on the burden of entertain the common man. With the suppuration difficulty of achieving good grades and playing plays in school, it is only reliable student athletes receive some benefit for their efforts.
Student athletes must practice day and night to change and perfect their athleticism while simultaneously doing their school work; whereas, students who do not play a sport can concentrate more than on school work and receive better grades. Thus, it is only just that students who play a sport receive special benefits that allow them to be on rack up with th ose who dont. For instance, student athletes! do not have as much time as other students because they must attend practice and compete in competitions; hence, they must be given spare time to consummate their school work. Furthermore, statistics show... If you want to get a full essay, bless it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment